Dumb it down?

A friend of mine, someone with the best of intentions, said something the other day that nearly stopped me in my tracks.

“Maybe you’d sell a lot more books if you dumbed your writing down.”

Now, I had to think about that for a second because he wasn’t referring to my subject matter — the immortal Martuk slaying his way through a lifetime of endless centuries — but more to the way it’s written. It’s intelligent. It has a unique voice that still follows the basic rules of sentence structure and grammar. It’s ambitious but still accessible. The sentences are more lyrical than not. There’s character development and several story lines all spinning around a central narrative held together in a clever framing device. And this narrative is designed to not only stand alone, but stretch over a three-book series as well as an ongoing collection of short fiction.

Ah, you see? There’s the problem.

Publishing these days — and I’m talking about indie, single author, and the Big Five — isn’t as focused on quality as it could be. The mediocre is applauded. The abysmal is celebrated. Anyone writing anything that would be considered “normal” ten years ago — story, appropriate dialogue tags, realistic conversations from people who could actually exist — is thought of as an anomaly. Something new. Different.

And that worries me.

That the bar would be so low that the telling of a story would be thought of as something newsworthy is not a good thing. In fact, as I said in a recent interview, we, as Writers, should be expected to tell a story. Telling one should not be seen as something cool. It’s our feckin’ job, for Christ’s sake!

But so many have found success doing so little. Or doing so little so poorly that their attitude is, Well, people seem to like it, so why change?

Why change?

Because you can do better. Because your readers, whether they know it or not, want you to do better.

Because if you keep half-assing it, that will become the New Normal, you won’t grow as a writer, and there will be generations of readers who won’t know Good Writing from a hole in the ground. Though you know damn well at least the hole will have a backstory as to how it got there whereas your book will be a long series of events that end up leading to a big fat Nothing.

So, here’s the deal:

I’ll continue writing the way I write. That’s the little I can do to change the tide. And when readers tire of piss-poor writing revolving around non-existent stories peopled by cardboard cutouts murmuring, sighing, giggling, growling, breathing, whispering, moaning, laughing inane ridiculous dialogue no one would actually say, my work — and the work of hundreds if not thousands like me — will be there waiting for them.

‘Cause I’ll be damned if I’m going to dumb it down.

 

 

Advertisements

6 comments on “Dumb it down?

  1. Aami Aabir says:

    I think one can define professionalism as the act of giving the best quality output possible… So dont mellow it down to mediocre standards just because some people donot get its depth..

    • Thank you, Aami. The trick now is to find readers who recognize that what they’ve accepted as “good” maybe isn’t and that they deserve better. That’ll be when the tide really turns.

  2. It’s actually a Reply worthy of a Post of its own. 😉 And the lower standard we now see is not necessarily intertwined with the lack of interest in reading. They are, in my opinion, two separate issues.

    The falling standard can be traced to readers believing those who write like e.l. james and Stephenie Meyer are “good writers.” I mean, if they became bestsellers, then that MUST be how you write, right?

    Wrong.

    So we now have a whole generation of readers and potential writers who aspire to write like e.l. james and Stephenie Meyer. Not a good thing.

    As for people not reading as much these days, it could be lack of time, the view that reading is not worth the investment in time and attention, falling education standards, and, really, just people not finding anything they WANT to read.

    Again, this could be a whole Post on its own. And maybe it will be. Who knows? 🙂

  3. samulraney says:

    The joy of self publishing is not having your voice altered by gatekeepers and those looking to make your writing palatable to the masses. Keep your voice, write well, and readers who like what they see will come back for more. Write on!

    • Thank you, Samul. That’s exactly why I decided to single author publish instead of align myself with the Big Five. I want to write what I want, be courageous and provocative, release the work on a calendar of my choosing, and reap the rewards in a timely manner. The Big Five, as it now stands, is the exact opposite of that. Besides, I believe readers today are finding single author published work (or self-published) is, in some ways, better than their Big Five counterparts. I’d like to do my small part in continuing that tradition. 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s